MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388421410 · doi:10.1002/cpz1.922

Using ExpressAnalyst for Comprehensive Gene Expression Analysis in Model and Non‐Model Organisms

2023· review· en· W4388421410 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Protocols · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene expression and cancer classification
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNormalization (sociology)Computer scienceDNA microarrayComputational biologyGene expression profilingProtocol (science)Data miningBiologyGene expressionGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ExpressAnalyst is a web-based platform that enables intuitive, end-to-end transcriptomics and proteomics data analysis. Users can start from FASTQ files, gene/protein abundance tables, or gene/protein lists. ExpressAnalyst will perform read quantification, gene expression table processing and normalization, differential expression analysis, or meta-analysis with complex study designs. The results are presented via various interactive visualizations such as volcano plots, heatmaps, networks, and ridgeline charts, with built-in functional enrichment analysis to allow flexible data exploration and understanding. ExpressAnalyst currently contains built-in support for 29 common organisms. For non-model organisms without good reference genomes, it can perform comprehensive transcriptome profiling directly from RNA-seq reads. These common tasks are covered in 11 Basic Protocols. © 2023 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: RNA-seq count table uploading, processing, and normalization Basic Protocol 2: Differential expression analysis with linear models Basic Protocol 3: Functional analysis with volcano plot, enrichment network, and ridgeline visualization Basic Protocol 4: Hierarchical clustering analysis of transcriptomics data using interactive heatmaps Basic Protocol 5: Cross-species gene expression analysis based on ortholog mapping results Basic Protocol 6: Proteomics and microarray data processing and normalization Basic Protocol 7: Preparing multiple gene expression tables for meta-analysis Basic Protocol 8: Statistical and functional meta-analysis of gene expression data Basic Protocol 9: Functional analysis of transcriptomics signatures Basic Protocol 10: Dose-response and time-series data analysis Basic Protocol 11: RNA-seq reads processing and quantification with and without reference transcriptomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.331
GPT teacher head0.486
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it