Using ExpressAnalyst for Comprehensive Gene Expression Analysis in Model and Non‐Model Organisms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ExpressAnalyst is a web-based platform that enables intuitive, end-to-end transcriptomics and proteomics data analysis. Users can start from FASTQ files, gene/protein abundance tables, or gene/protein lists. ExpressAnalyst will perform read quantification, gene expression table processing and normalization, differential expression analysis, or meta-analysis with complex study designs. The results are presented via various interactive visualizations such as volcano plots, heatmaps, networks, and ridgeline charts, with built-in functional enrichment analysis to allow flexible data exploration and understanding. ExpressAnalyst currently contains built-in support for 29 common organisms. For non-model organisms without good reference genomes, it can perform comprehensive transcriptome profiling directly from RNA-seq reads. These common tasks are covered in 11 Basic Protocols. © 2023 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: RNA-seq count table uploading, processing, and normalization Basic Protocol 2: Differential expression analysis with linear models Basic Protocol 3: Functional analysis with volcano plot, enrichment network, and ridgeline visualization Basic Protocol 4: Hierarchical clustering analysis of transcriptomics data using interactive heatmaps Basic Protocol 5: Cross-species gene expression analysis based on ortholog mapping results Basic Protocol 6: Proteomics and microarray data processing and normalization Basic Protocol 7: Preparing multiple gene expression tables for meta-analysis Basic Protocol 8: Statistical and functional meta-analysis of gene expression data Basic Protocol 9: Functional analysis of transcriptomics signatures Basic Protocol 10: Dose-response and time-series data analysis Basic Protocol 11: RNA-seq reads processing and quantification with and without reference transcriptomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".