Seismic 3D full-horizon tracking based on a knowledge graph to represent the stratigraphic sequence relationship
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Seismic 3D full-horizon tracking is a fundamental and crucial step in sequence analysis and reservoir modeling. Existing automatic full-horizon tracking approaches lack effective methods for representing the stratigraphic sequence relationships in seismic data. However, the inability to represent the stratigraphic sequence relationships fully and accurately makes it challenging to address discontinuous areas affected by faults and unconformities. To address this issue, we develop a knowledge graph representing the stratigraphic sequence relationship, which enables the simultaneous extraction of all horizon surfaces once the stratigraphic distribution of the seismic data is obtained. This method first generates horizon patches and calculates the fault attributes, followed by the construction of an initial knowledge graph that characterizes the overall distribution of horizon patches and faults. The initial knowledge graph comprises nodes and edges. The nodes represent horizon patches, and their attributes cover the geographical location information of the patches and faults. Simultaneously, the edges represent the relationship between the horizon patches, including the stratigraphic sequence relationship, and their attributes illustrate the potential for connecting these patches. Furthermore, we introduce a multilayer knowledge graph based on the point-set topology to fuse the nodes. This allows for the continuous merging of the horizon patches to obtain horizon surfaces across discontinuities with the constraints of fault attributes and stratigraphic sequence relationships in 3D space. Synthetic and field examples demonstrate that our approach can effectively represent stratigraphic sequence relationships and accurately track horizons located in discontinuous areas with faults and unconformities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".