A Blood-Based Lipid Profile Associated With Hippocampal Volume and Brain Resting-State Activation Within Obese Adults from the UK Biobank
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives:Obesity and dyslipidemia may be associated with hippocampal alterations and may increase the risk of neurodegeneration. This study studied hippocampal anatomical and functional association with a lipid profile based on high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, and triglyceride related to dyslipidemia in obese and nonobese adults. A whole-brain analysis was also conducted to examine the effect of dyslipidemia on resting-state function across the brain. Participants and Methods:In total, 553 UK Biobank participants comprised three groups based on body mass index (BMI) rankings: obese adults with high BMI (OHigh, n = 184, 32.7 kg/m2 ≤ BMI ≤53.4 kg/m2), obese adults with a lower BMI (OLow, n = 182, 30.3 kg/m2 ≤ BMI ≤32.6 kg/m2), and nonobese controls (n = 187). Structural MRI and functional MRI data were accessed. The fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFFs) maps was calculated to reflect resting-state brain activity. A lipid health factor was created using principal component analysis. Linear models tested for associations between the lipid health score and hippocampal MRI readouts. Results:With a higher lipid health factor corresponding to a lower dyslipidemia risk, we found a positive correlation between hippocampal volume with the lipid health factor exclusively in group OLow (p = 0.01). We also found a positive association between the lipid health factor and hippocampal fALFF in group OHigh (p = 0.02). Additional fALFF voxel-wise analysis to group OHigh also implicated that the premotor cortex, amygdala, thalamus, subcallosal cortex, temporal fusiform cortex, and middle temporal gyrus brain regions are related with lipid. Conclusion:The study finds novel associations among circulating lipid, hippocampal structure, and hippocampal function exclusively in the obese adults.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".