MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388424291 · doi:10.3390/agriculture13112102

Simulation of Climate Change Impacts on Crop Yield in the Saskatchewan Grain Belt Using an Improved SWAT Model

2023· article· en· W4388424291 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Mohammad Zare, Shahid Azam, David Sauchyn

Bibliographic record

VenueAgriculture · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersUniversity of Regina
KeywordsEnvironmental sciencePrecipitationStreamflowSWAT modelClimate changeYield (engineering)Soil and Water Assessment ToolCrop yieldIrrigationClimate modelCanolaAgricultureCropForcing (mathematics)Weather Research and Forecasting ModelClimatologyDownscalingRadiative forcingAgronomyGeographyMeteorologyEcologyDrainage basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate change has a potentially significant influence on agricultural production in southern Saskatchewan. Crop yields are susceptible to weather patterns and seasonal fluctuations in this sub-humid region owing to the predominance of rain-fed farming practices. A modified Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT-M) and the output from 10 high-resolution (0.22°) regional climate models (RCMs) were used to develop simulations of spring wheat and rain-fed canola in 296 rural municipalities (RM) for a historical baseline period (1975–2004) and three 30-year future periods: near (2010–2039), middle (2040–2069), and far (2070–2099). We combined SWAT-M with the S-curve method to adjust yield to the original drought stress in the source code and evaluated eight indices of extreme precipitation and temperature. Results of calibration and validation suggest that the simulated crop yields generally agree with observed data. Crop yield showed lesser performance compared with streamflow and soil water content (SWC) along with percent bias, ranging from −9.6% to −14.8%, while streamflow calibration ranges from −5.3% to −7.7%. The multi-model ensemble median showed increasing radiative forcing in the temperature and precipitation indices, such that the RCM-projected weather indices were found to be warmer and wetter than those estimated using regional historical data. The results of simulating canola and spring wheat indicate an increase in crop yield of 17% and 9.7% in the near future, 28.2% and 15.6% in the middle future, and 44.7% and 32% in the far future, respectively. Although, there has been an increase in the median wheat and canola yields, a significant reduction in the annual production is observed. This decline in yield amounts to around 1000 kg/ha and is anticipated to occur in the near and middle future. This trend is quite pronounced in the extreme south and southwest regions. Overall, this innovative research framework, along with the region-specific model outcomes in the form of crop yield projections, will aid in the formulation of future agricultural policies aimed at promoting effective climate adaptation strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.289
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgricultureSame topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207