MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4388426287 · doi:10.53011/jmro.2023.02.03

Radiation Therapy for Ocular Melanoma – a Narrative Review with Insides from TRIUMF, Canada’s Only Proton Beam Therapy Center

2023· review· en· W4388426287 on OpenAlexaffabout
Andrew Naus, Norbert Banyi, Roy Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical and Radiation Oncology · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Oncology and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEnucleationProton therapyRadiation therapyRadiosurgeryParticle therapyNuclear medicineRadiologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"Ocular melanoma (OM) originates from melanocytes in the eye, predominantly in the uvea, particularly the choroid. The yearly incidence is around six cases per million. OM is not primarily driven by ultraviolet exposure like skin melanoma, but is usually caused by mutations in GNAQ or GNA11. Symptoms like blurry vision and visual field defects appear late. Diagnosis is often made via eye exams, specialized ultrasound, and rarely biopsy. This narrative review describes the radiation treatment modalities of OM and highlights the landscape of proton beam irradiation in Canada. Historically, enucleation was the standard of care for OM. However, current strategies consider tumor size, location, patient age, visual potential, and metastatic presence. Primary treatments include radiation therapy and surgery. Radiation therapy includes plaque brachytherapy (PB), proton beam irradiation (PBI), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Surgery includes endoresection, exoresection, and enucleation. Tebentafusp-tebn has been FDA-approved for metastatic cases. PB, the most common radiation therapy for OM, involves radioisotopes delivering radiation into the tumor. Comparable survival rates between PB and enucleation for medium choroidal melanoma have made PB the standard of care. PB has certain limitations, mainly surgical complications. PBI uses a particle accelerator for focused, high-energy proton radiation, yielding high tumor control and survival rates, though the availability of proton facilities is a significant limitation. Vancouver is the only center in Canada for PBI, administered not in a healthcare facility but at TRIUMF (Tri-University Meson Facility). TRIUMF, the world's largest cyclotron particle accelerator, in partnership with BC Cancer and UBC Department of Ophthalmology and Eye Care Center, has treated over 200 ocular melanoma patients between 1995 and 2017, achieving a 91% tumor control rate and 82% five-year survival rate. Emerging combination therapies like Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) protein kinase inhibition before PBI show potential, possibly reducing radiation dose and resistance."

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical and Radiation Oncology→Same topicOcular Oncology and Treatments→French-language works237,207→