Reliance en Complexité (2023). Éditoriaux en pensée complexe. Paris : L’Harmattan. Collection Questions contemporaines. 143 pages
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet ouvrage runit un certain nombre de textes ou ditoriaux rdigs par les membres du groupe 'Reliance en Complexit'. Ce groupe est issu d'une premire activit en octobre 2019, alors que s'est tenue une runion rassemblant une douzaine de membres, chercheurs, enseignants, consultants ou professionnels qui s'intressent la pense d'Edgar Morin et tentent de l'appliquer dans leurs domaines de travail respectifs. Lors de cette rencontre, chacun a prsent comment il utilise la pense complexe de Morin dans l'enseignement ou dans ses autres activits professionnelles. L'objectif de tous est d'utiliser cette pense pour tenter de mieux comprendre les divers problmes sociaux pour ensuite chercher y trouver des solutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".