MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388431687 · doi:10.35767/gscpgbull.69.1.51

Structural geometry and kinematic history of the southern Kicking Horse Rim Cambrian carbonate platform: out-of-sequence thrust faulting in the southern Canadian Rocky Mountains

2022· article· en· W4388431687 on OpenAlexaffabout
M E McMechan

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Canadian Energy Geoscience · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of CanadaNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyCarbonate platformPaleontologyFaciesCarbonateLithologyNappeStructural basinGeomorphologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The structure of the southern Kicking Horse Rim Cambrian carbonate platform is spectacularly exposed in the Rocky Mountains southwest of Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Episodic uplift along the approximately 100 km long, north-northwest-trending Kicking Horse Rim during the middle and upper Cambrian controlled the position of the Cambrian carbonate platform to basin facies change. Extensive hydrothermal alteration, with local magnesite and/or Pb-Zn mineralization occurred along the west margin of the Rim. Spectacular slump scars, escarpments, megaconglomerates and slide masses locally mark the edge of the southern Kicking Horse Rim platform. Megaconglomerates form a unique and indisputable stratigraphic tie between the basin and platform and show that there is no stratigraphic gap or suture along this boundary. The change from carbonate- to shale-dominated lithologies resulted in a major change in structural style and the boundary between the Eastern and Western Main Ranges structural subprovinces. Serial and regional cross-sections across the area document the southward plunge of Kicking Horse Rim strata and the Eastern Main Ranges structural subprovince and show that this is due to underlying structure, and not stratigraphic thinning of the Cambrian carbonate platform. Prospective horizons for mineralization extend southward in the subsurface beyond their current southern limit of exposure. Kicking Horse Rim and associated Cambrian strata were carried northeastward along the Fatigue Thrust - blind thrust fault system. Because of a prominent hanging wall ramp through the entire Cambrian succession along the east side of the Kicking Horse Rim, the southern Kicking Horse Rim and Cambrian platform formed an asymmetric, east-facing anticline with a long gently-dipping west limb as they were uplifted and carried northeastward. In the northern part of the study area, displacement was along the Fatigue Thrust and the fault climbed through the Paleozoic section. In the south, most displacement on this fault system went into a blind detachment fault near the base of the thick basinal lower Ordovician section and overlying faulted detachment folds. The Simpson Pass Thrust truncated and overrode in its footwall the east-facing anticline and other structures developed in the hanging wall of the Fatigue Thrust. The Simpson Pass Thrust is out-of-sequence relative to the Fatigue Thrust and is one of the few larger displacement, out-of-sequence thrust faults recognized in the southern Canadian Rocky Mountains. Deformation of the Western Main Ranges and thrust faults near the Cambrian facies change occurred prior to the main motion along the Fatigue Thrust - blind thrust system. Motion on this thrust system, and the formation of faulted detachment folds that extend southward into the eastern part of the Porcupine Creek fan structure, occurred prior to motion on the Simpson Pass Thrust. Deformation of all these structures occurred during Jurassic–Early Cretaceous deformation most likely sometime prior to 125 Ma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Canadian Energy GeoscienceSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207