MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388439544 · doi:10.7202/1106755ar

Les titres adossés à des créances hypothécaires : caractéristiques et propriétés

2023· article· fr· W4388439544 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
M. Martin Boyer, François Girard

Bibliographic record

VenueAssurances et gestion des risques · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicPrivate Equity and Venture Capital
Canadian institutionsCenter for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on OrganizationsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le marché des titres adossés à des créances hypothécaires au Canada est un marché qui est à la fois mature et en développement. Bien que les contrats hypothécaires ne représentent rien de nouveau, la vague de titrisation des créances au cours des années 80 a fait en sorte que ces titres financiers sont devenus négociables et largement liquides. Notre article se penche sur une analyse comparative du marché canadien vis-à-vis du marché américain afin d’en comprendre les différences. La compréhension du fonctionnement du marché des créances hypothécaires est essentielle pour comprendre la crise des hypothèques à haut risque qui a fait rage à la fin de l’année 2007.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.624
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.007
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAssurances et gestion des risquesSame topicPrivate Equity and Venture CapitalFrench-language works237,207