MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Dense Error Map Estimation for MRI-Ultrasound Registration in Brain Tumor Surgery Using Swin UNETR

2023· article· en· W4388447480 on OpenAlexaff
Soorena Salari, Amirhossein Rasoulian, Hassan Rivaz, Yiming Xiao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedical Image Segmentation Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRendering (computer graphics)Image registrationArtificial intelligenceSurgical planningBrain tumorMedicineComputer visionRadiologyImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Early surgical treatment of brain tumors is crucial in reducing patient mortality rates. However, brain tissue deformation (called brain shift) occurs during the surgery, rendering pre-operative images invalid. As a cost-effective and portable tool, intra-operative ultrasound (iUS) can track brain shift, and accurate MRI-iUS registration techniques can update pre-surgical plans and facilitate the interpretation of iUS. This can boost surgical safety and outcomes by maximizing tumor removal while avoiding eloquent regions. However, manual assessment of MRI-iUS registration results in real-time is difficult and prone to errors due to the 3D nature of the data. Automatic algorithms that can quantify the quality of inter-modal medical image registration outcomes can be highly beneficial. Therefore, we propose a novel deep-learning (DL) based framework with the Swin UNETR to automatically assess 3D-patch-wise dense error maps for MRI-iUS registration in iUS-guided brain tumor resection and show its performance with real clinical data for the first time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207