MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Novel Fabrication Process for Thin, Flexible, Backside-accessible Polymer-based CMUTs for Acoustic Emission Sensing

2023· article· en· W4388447584 on OpenAlexaff
Jonas Welsch, Carlos D. Gerardo, Robert Rohling, Edmond Cretu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceFabricationTransducerOptoelectronicsCapacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducersAcoustic emissionCapacitive sensingLaser Doppler vibrometerLaserAcousticsPiezoelectricityOpticsComputer scienceWavelengthComposite materialDistributed feedback laser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work we present an advancement of our previously published work on highly sensitive polymer-based capacitive micromachined transducers (polyCMUTs) for structural health monitoring. This was motivated by the present limitations of today's acoustic emission sensing transducers: most have a large footprint, are made of stiff materials, and need additional matching or protective layers for the typical frontside access for electrical connections. We developed a fabrication process producing thin, backside-accessible, SU-8-based sensitive polyCMUTs. Each polyCMUT element has 500 cells of 90μm diameter on a flexible and optically transparent substrate. The transducers were fabricated, characterized with a laser doppler vibrometer (LDV) showing sensitivity from 40kHz to 3 MHz and tested with a pencil lead break test on a carbon fiber plate resulting in signals from 30 to 100 mv peak to peak.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave PropagationFrench-language works237,207