Cooperative control for multi-player pursuit-evasion games embedded on communication technology with reinforcement learning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<title>Abstract</title> Recent advances in research on the Multi-agent System (MAS) optimal control issue will help sectors like robotics, communications, and power systems. This work looks at the intelligent design of a large-scale multi-pursuer and multi-evader pursuit-evasion game. Based on reinforcement learning, a distributed cooperative pursuit method with communication is created. The famed Curse of Dimensionality poses a serious danger to multi-player pursuit-evasion game designs due to the sheer number of agents, especially in hostile areas where there aren't many communication options available to encourage player information exchange. In order to find the best pursuit-evasion strategies using a novel type of probability density function (PDF) rather than exhaustive data from all the remaining teams or agents, the Mean Field Games (MFG) theory has been used. A novel MAS optimum type oversight system with a decentralised and computer-friendly decision method is urgently needed. Mean field game theory is used to create the Actor-critic-mass (ACM), a decentralised optimal control system, to address the aforementioned issues. Additionally, the homogeneous decentralised Actor-critic-mass (HDACM) which improves the ACM method, does away with restrictions like homogeneous agents and cost functions. Finally, two applications make use of the PAS algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it