MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388451267 · doi:10.1016/j.cjcpc.2023.11.001

Challenges and Opportunities for Patients With Tetralogy of Fallot Across the Lifespan

2023· editorial· en· W4388451267 on OpenAlexaff
Frédéric Dallaire, Jasmine Grewal, Wadi Mawad, Rachel M. Wald

Bibliographic record

VenueCJC Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkMcGill UniversityMontreal Children's HospitalUniversité de SherbrookeSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTetralogy of FallotAsymptomaticMedicineRisk stratificationScopusPsychological interventionHeart diseaseCardiologyInternal medicineIntensive care medicineMEDLINEPsychiatryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

More than 70 years after the description of its first successful surgical repair, tetralogy of Fallot (ToF) remains a challenging but fascinating form of congenital heart disease. Patients born with ToF can be expected to live into adulthood with a 30-year survival which exceeds 95%.1 Nevertheless, residual cardiac lesions after repair are nearly ubiquitous. These residual lesions include pressure-loading or volume-loading conditions, sometimes both. Consequently considerable heterogeneity in sequelae can be seen with a wide spectrum of presenting features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.038
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.038
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.008
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCJC Pediatric and Congenital Heart DiseaseSame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207