Bridging the Gap: Comprehensive Boreal Forest Complexity Mapping through LVIS Full-Waveform LiDAR, Single-Year and Time Series Landsat Imagery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The extrapolation of forest structural attributes from LiDAR has traditionally been restricted to local or regional scales, hindering a thorough assessment of single-year versus time series predictors across expansive spatial scales. We extrapolated the vertical complexity captured by the Land, Vegetation, and Ice Sensor (LVIS) full-wave form LiDAR of boreal forests in the Alaska–Yukon–Northwest Territories region, utilizing predictors from Landsat images from 1989 to 2019. This included both single-year and long-term estimates of vegetation indices, alongside constant factors like terrain slope and location. Random forest regression models comparing the single-year and 15-year and 30-year time series models were applied. Additionally, the potential of estimating horizontal forest complexity from vertical complexity was explored using a moving window approach in the Kluane Valley. While the extended time series marginally enhanced model accuracy, a fine-tuned single-year model proved superior (R2 = 0.84, relative RRMSE = 8.4%). In estimating the horizontal complexity, the variance in a 5 × 5 moving window displayed the most promising results, aligning with traditional horizontal structure measures. Single-year Landsat models could potentially surpass time series models in predicting forest vertical complexity, with the added capability to estimate horizontal complexity using variance in a moving window approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".