MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388455116 · doi:10.1145/3631610

HyBNN: Quantifying and Optimizing Hardware Efficiency of Binary Neural Networks

2023· article· en· W4388455116 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaXidian UniversityChina Association for Science and Technology
KeywordsComputer scienceFloating pointQuantization (signal processing)Overhead (engineering)Computer hardwareBinary numberHardware accelerationDeep learningArtificial neural networkComputer engineeringInferenceEdge deviceAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceField-programmable gate arrayArithmeticMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Binary neural network (BNN), where both the weight and the activation values are represented with one bit, provides an attractive alternative to deploy highly efficient deep learning inference on resource-constrained edge devices. However, our investigation reveals that, to achieve satisfactory accuracy gains, state-of-the-art (SOTA) BNNs, such as FracBNN and ReActNet, usually have to incorporate various auxiliary floating-point components and increase the model size, which in turn degrades the hardware performance efficiency. In this article, we aim to quantify such hardware inefficiency in SOTA BNNs and further mitigate it with negligible accuracy loss. First, we observe that the auxiliary floating-point (AFP) components consume an average of 93% DSPs, 46% LUTs, and 62% FFs, among the entire BNN accelerator resource utilization. To mitigate such overhead, we propose a novel algorithm-hardware co-design, called FuseBNN , to fuse those AFP operators without hurting the accuracy. On average, FuseBNN reduces AFP resource utilization to 59% DSPs, 13% LUTs, and 16% FFs. Second, SOTA BNNs often use the compact MobileNetV1 as the backbone network but have to replace the lightweight 3 × 3 depth-wise convolution (DWC) with the 3 × 3 standard convolution (SC, e.g., in ReActNet and our ReActNet-adapted BaseBNN) or even more complex fractional 3 × 3 SC (e.g., in FracBNN) to bridge the accuracy gap. As a result, the model parameter size is significantly increased and becomes 2.25× larger than that of the 4-bit direct quantization with the original DWC (4-Bit-Net); the number of multiply-accumulate operations is also significantly increased so that the overall LUT resource usage of BaseBNN is almost the same as that of 4-Bit-Net. To address this issue, we propose HyBNN , where we binarize depth-wise separation convolution (DSC) blocks for the first time to decrease the model size and incorporate 4-bit DSC blocks to compensate for the accuracy loss. For the ship detection task in synthetic aperture radar imagery on the AMD-Xilinx ZCU102 FPGA, HyBNN achieves a detection accuracy of 94.8% and a detection speed of 615 frames per second (FPS), which is 6.8× faster than FuseBNN+ (94.9% accuracy) and 2.7× faster than 4-Bit-Net (95.9% accuracy). For image classification on the CIFAR-10 dataset on the AMD-Xilinx Ultra96-V2 FPGA, HyBNN achieves 1.5× speedup and 0.7% better accuracy over SOTA FracBNN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.858
Threshold uncertainty score0.649

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it