MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388458624 · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2023.108407

The functional mutational landscape of the lacZ gene

2023· article· en· W4388458624 on OpenAlexafffund
Marc A. Beal, Matthew J. Meier, Angela Dykes, Carole L. Yauk, Iain B. Lambert, Francesco Marchetti

Bibliographic record

VenueiScience · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversity of OttawaHealth Canada
FundersHealth CanadaCanada Research Chairs
Keywordslac operonGeneMissense mutationOperonMutagenesisMutationEscherichia coliGeneticsBiologyBeta-galactosidaseDirected mutagenesisBiochemistryFunction (biology)Silent mutationEnzymeDirected evolutionChemistryMutant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The lacZ gene of Escherichia coli encodes β-galactosidase (β-gal), a lactose metabolism enzyme of the lactose operon. Previous chemical modification or site-directed mutagenesis experiments have identified 21 amino acids that are essential for β-gal catalytic activity. We have assembled over 10,000 lacZ mutations from published studies that were collected using a positive selection assay to identify mutations in lacZ that disrupted β-gal function. We analyzed 6,465 independent lacZ mutations that resulted in 2,732 missense mutations that impaired β-gal function. Those mutations affected 492 of the 1,023 lacZ codons, including most of the 21 previously known residues critical for catalytic activity. Most missense mutations occurred near the catalytic site and in regions important for subunit tetramerization. Overall, our work provides a comprehensive and detailed map of the amino acid residues affecting the structure and catalytic activity of the β-gal enzyme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score0.134

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueiScienceSame topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancerFrench-language works237,207