MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388460174 · doi:10.1177/20543581231209009

Complement-Mediated Thrombotic Microangiopathy in Pregnancy: An Educational Case Report

2023· article· en· W4388460174 on OpenAlexaff
Valentina Bruno, David Barth, Arenn Jauhal

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity Health NetworkSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThrombotic microangiopathyMedicineEculizumabAtypical hemolytic uremic syndromeHELLP syndromePregnancyPreeclampsiaContext (archaeology)Acute kidney injuryADAMTS13Internal medicineGastroenterologyThrombotic thrombocytopenic purpuraObstetricsImmunologyComplement systemDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rationale: Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is a spectrum of rare diseases characterized by thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, and organ damage. Differentiating pre-eclampsia, HELLP (Hemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes, Low Platelets) syndrome and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) during pregnancy may be diagnostically challenging yet important as the treatment pathways differ. Most cases of aHUS are associated with dysregulation of the complement alternative pathway, for which current guidelines recommend prompt treatment with complement C5 inhibitor to prevent chronic sequelae. Here, we report a case of pregnancy-associated aHUS (p-aHUS) to highlight the challenging aspects of the diagnostic process and the importance of prompt treatment with complement inhibition to reduce the risk of poor outcomes. Presenting concerns: A 28-year-old woman was admitted to a local hospital for induction of vaginal delivery of twins at 34 weeks and 3 days of gestational age, due to intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). She was previously healthy, and this current pregnancy was uncomplicated, except for the IUGR. Approximately, 10 hours after her induced delivery, she developed vomiting, epigastric pain, and hypertension. Diagnosis: She was initially suspected of having fulminant liver failure in the context of acute fatty liver of pregnancy versus pre-eclampsia/HELLP syndrome, due to evidence of elevated liver enzymes, acute kidney injury (AKI), thrombocytopenia, and hemoglobin levels trending down, for which the patient was initially treated conservatively. On day 2 post-delivery, she was transferred to our hospital for possible liver biopsy and management of liver failure. Upon transfer, dialysis was started due to anuric AKI; at the same time, her liver function spontaneously improved, while platelet count remained very low and hemoglobin levels continued to trend down. A full TMA work-up revealed low C3 levels; secondary causes of TMA were ruled out. The patient received a final diagnosis of p-aHUS. Complement genetic tests were also performed and did not identify any pathogenic variants. Interventions: Given the final diagnosis of p-aHUS, the patient was started on a C5 inhibitor (day 8 post-delivery). Her platelet count quickly normalized 2 days after the first dose, while the hemoglobin levels remained low for a longer period, likely due to retained products of conception. Outcomes: at the 6-month follow-up. Teaching points: The diagnosis of p-aHUS can be challenging due to frequent overlapping symptoms and signs with other forms of pregnancy-associated TMA, leading to a delay of the treatment, which can affect the patient's outcome. Failure of TMA to improve in the postpartum period or occurring at this time, with negative ADAMTS13 and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APLAS) serologies should favor the diagnosis of p-aHUS. Early treatment with C5 inhibition should be considered in women with a diagnosis of p-aHUS. Patients need multidisciplinary and likely tertiary/quaternary care at centers where clinical experience, access to diagnostics and treatment initiation can begin without delay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Kidney Health and DiseaseSame topicComplement system in diseasesFrench-language works237,207