MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388467129 · doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2023-5587

Incidence of familial hypercholesterolemia in patients with early manifestations of coronary artery disease: data from a Russian multicenter study and meta-analysis

2023· article· en· W4388467129 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A. Rogozhina, A Averkova, Е. A. Zubova, Л. О. Минушкина, В. А. Бражник, О.Н. Иванова, Н. В. Чичкова, Н. Р. Хасанов, О. И. Боева, D. A. Zateyshchikov

Bibliographic record

VenueRussian Journal of Cardiology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFamilial hypercholesterolemiaPCSK9Internal medicineCoronary artery diseaseApolipoprotein BProbandIncidence (geometry)LDL receptorLipoproteinGastroenterologyCardiologyCholesterolGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aim. To assess the possibility of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) detection among patients with early coronary artery disease (CAD) in practice in comparison with data from different populations. Patients with early manifestations of CAD are a promising group for identifying a proband with FH and subsequent cascade screening. The question remains open about the sufficiency of clinical criteria for diagnosing this disease. Material and methods. We examined 651 patients with CAD manifestations aged £55 years in men and £60 years in women. FH was diagnosed according to the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) criteria, and cardiovascular risk was assessed using the Montreal-FH-SCOR E. In 35 phenotype-positive patients with FH, as well as 5 with lowdensity lipoprotein cholesterol levels ³5,5 mmol/l and 23 with age of manifestation of coronary artery disease £35 years, the coding sequence of the genes for apolipoprotein B (APOB), low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), low-density lipoprotein receptor adapter protein 1 (LDLRAP1), proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9). Results. Definite FH was in 8 (1,2%), probable in 27 (4.2%), possible in 339 (52,1%) patients, while 277 (42,5%) patients had DLCN score of <3 points; 31 (88,6%), of 35 phenotype-positive patients had a high Montreal-FH-SCORE risk. Six carriers of pathogenic variants were identified, 2 of which were among phenotype-negative patients. A meta-analysis of 16 studies with 13065 patients (2012-2023) showed that the incidence of FH is 5,22 (4,848-5,619)% (fixed model) and 5,93 (4,528-7,515)% (random model). Conclusion. The use of existing diagnostic scales does not provide guaranteed detection of FH among patients with early CAD. It is likely that DLCN modification by additional gradation of the criterion for the age of CAD manifestation will help increase its diagnostic value.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.009
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussian Journal of CardiologySame topicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthFrench-language works237,207