MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388470014 · doi:10.11159/jffhmt.2023.018

The Impact of Collisions on Heat Transfer in a Particle-Laden Shearless Turbulent Flow

2023· article· en· W4388470014 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hamid Reza Zandi Pour, Michele Iovieno

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Flow Heat and Mass Transfer · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurbulenceMechanicsHeat transferParticle flowFlow (mathematics)Environmental scienceParticle (ecology)PhysicsAtmospheric sciencesStatistical physicsMeteorologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

mental investigation for decades. On the other hand, particleparticle collisions play a significant role in particulate turbulent flows even in relatively diluted suspensions. The effect of collision has been under investigation since the state-of-theart work of Saffman For instance, collisions between water droplets in clouds are a necessary condition for precipitation formation from cloud droplets and ice crystals, while, particle-particle collisions have a profound impact on the onset and evolution of sandstorms In these processes, the background turbulence of the carrier flow favors inter-particle collisions. The mechanisms of the collision rate enhancement by background turbulence have only become clear in the past few years, and the underlying physics is currently qualitatively well understood, although quantifying the rate of small particles collisions suspended in a turbulent flow may require more advancement. As a pioneering work on the collision effect in particle-laden turbulent flows, Saffman et al., developed the theory of collision of water droplet in cloud physics and they could formulate the droplet collision rates for identical small low-inertial droplets in terms of droplet dimension and turbulence characteristics (the rate of turbulent kinetic energy dissipation and the kinematic viscosity of fluid ). Their findings suggested that the collision frequency of the small droplet suspended in clouds is independent of droplet properties However, in the subsequent works like the work of Sundaram et al., it was found that droplet properties also influence the collision rate. The results of Sundaram et al., showed that particle parameters such as particle response time, number density and size can impact collision frequency as well as background turbulence. They showed the significant dependency of the collision rate on the droplet Stokes number There have also been detailed theoretical investigations of the collision rate, a particularly effective description of the collisionrate enhancement in terms of a stochastic model for the prob-Abstract -In this research, we undertake an investigation of a turbulent flow seeded with heavy inertial particles, employing Eulerian-Lagrangian point-particle direct numerical simulations in the twoway coupling regime. The primary objective of our investigation is to assess the influence of inter-particle collisions on heat transfer within the time-evolving thermal mixing layer that develops between two regions with distinct temperatures in a homogeneous and isotropic turbulent flow. Our findings encompass a range of Stokes numbers spanning from 0.2 to 3, while maintaining a thermal Stokes number to Stokes number ratio of 4.43, at a Taylor microscale Reynolds number up to 124. Our results reveal that particle collisions tend to diminish the correlation between particle temperature and velocity, consequently leading to a marginal reduction in the average heat transfer when compared to a collisionless regime at higher Stokes numbers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fluid Flow Heat and Mass TransferSame topicParticle Dynamics in Fluid FlowsFrench-language works237,207