MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388475071 · doi:10.3920/9789086867608_035

Resolving the enigma of embryonic diapause, a forty-year scientific journey

2012· book-chapter· en· W4388475071 on OpenAlexafffund
B. D. Murphy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive System and Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsCegep de Saint HyacintheUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsObligateBiologyDiapauseEmbryoEmbryonic stem cellCell biologyEmbryogenesisOvulationOffspringGeneticsGenePregnancyEcologyLarva

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Embryonic diapause is an evolutionary strategy by which a reversible arrest in embryo development occurs. In its two forms, facultative and obligate, it assures that offspring are born when optimal maternal and environmental conditions are present to ensure maximal survival. We have explored obligate delayed implantation in the mink over four decades, first by evaluation of the environmental regulation, then by determination of the pituitary factors that maintain diapause and provoke implantation followed by evaluation of the ovarian contribution to the process. As the uterine environment is the proximal regulator of diapause, we employed a strategy of global gene analysis to discover differentially expressed pathways during embryo arrest and reactivation. These trials revealed that the synthesis of polyamines was increased in the uterus with reactivation of the embryo in vivo. Subsequent experiments demonstrated that the polyamine, putrescine, was capable of inducing escape of the embryo from obligate diapause, providing strong evidence that the paucity of polyamines induces developmental arrest and reactivation is coupled to renewed uterine and/embryonic synthesis of these polycations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReproductive System and PregnancyFrench-language works237,207