A Case Series in Position-Aware Myoelectric Prosthesis Control Using Recurrent Convolutional Neural Network Classification with Transfer Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Position-aware myoelectric prosthesis controllers require long, data-intensive training routines. Transfer Learning (TL) might reduce training burden. A TL model can be pre-trained using forearm muscle signal data from many individuals to become the starting point for a new user. A recurrent convolutional neural network (RCNN)-based classifier has already been shown to benefit from TL in offline analysis (95% accuracy). The present real-time study tested whether an RCNN-based classification controller with TL (RCNN-TL) could reduce training burden, offer improved device control (per functional task performance metrics), and mitigate what is known as the "limb position effect". 27 participants without amputation were recruited. 19 participants performed wrist/hand movements across multiple limb positions, with resulting forearm muscle signal data used to pre-train RCNN-TL. 8 other participants donned a simulated prosthesis, retrained (calibrated) and tested RCNN-TL, plus trained and tested a conventional linear discriminant analysis classification controller (LDA-Baseline). Results confirmed that TL reduces user training burden. RCNN-TL yielded improved task performance durations over LDA-Baseline (in specific Grasp and Release phases), yet other metrics worsened. Overall, this work contributes training condition factors necessary for TL success, identifies metrics needed for comprehensive control analysis, and contributes insights towards improved position-aware control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".