Unravelling the Impact of Metal Dopants and Oxygen Vacancies on Syngas Conversion over Oxides: A Machine Learning-Accelerated Study of CO Activation on Cr-Doped ZnO Surfaces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide As a critical component of the OX–ZEO composite catalysts toward syngas conversion, the Cr-doped ZnO ternary system can be considered as a model system for understanding oxide catalysts. However, due to the complexity of its structures, traditional approaches, both experimental and theoretical, encounter significant challenges. Herein, we employ machine learning-accelerated methods, including grand canonical Monte Carlo and genetic algorithm, to explore the ZnO(10 1 0) surface with various Cr and oxygen vacancy (OV) concentrations. Stable surfaces with varied Cr and OV concentrations were then systematically investigated to examine their influence on the CO activation via density functional theory calculations. We observe that Cr tends to preferentially appear on the surface of ZnO(10 1 0) rather than in its interior regions and Cr-doped structures incline to form rectangular islands along the [0001] direction at high Cr and OV concentrations. Additionally, detailed calculations of CO reactivity unveil an inverse relationship between the reaction barrier ( E a ) for C–O bond dissociation and the Cr and OV concentrations, and a linear relationship is observed between OV formation energy and E a for CO activation. Further analyses indicate that the C–O bond dissociation is much more favored when the adjacent OVs are geometrically aligned in the [1 2 10] direction, and Cr is doped around the reactive sites. These findings provide a deeper insight into CO activation over the Cr-doped ZnO surface and offer valuable guidance for the rational design of effective catalysts for syngas conversion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".