MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Composición de la vegetación tras el establecimiento de un área natural protegida en el noroeste de México

2023· article· es· W4388489007 on OpenAlexaff
Sara Dennis-Pacheco, José Raúl Romo-León, Alejandro E. Castellanos, María Cristina Peñalba-Garmendia, Lara Cornejo-Denman

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Mexicana de Biodiversidad · 2023
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLand Use and Ecosystem Services
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyForestryArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Reserva Jaguar del Norte es una propiedad privada ubicada en la sierra sonorense, dentro de una compleja matriz paisajística, con un amplio legado de uso ganadero. Esta región, identificada como prioritaria para la conservación, dispone de pocos datos sobre las trayectorias de cambio en la vegetación, un elemento clave para evaluar el impacto de las áreas naturales protegidas. Este trabajo presenta información acerca del efecto de las acciones con fines de conservación, sobre la composición de la vegetación tras el establecimiento de la reserva en el año 2003. Para ésto, se caracterizaron las comunidades vegetales presentes y se generaron clasificaciones supervisadas de cobertura con imágenes satelitales de mediana y alta resolución para realizar un análisis cambio de la cobertura vegetal (2003-2018). Las precisiones generales de las clasificaciones fueron iguales o superiores a 0.75, valor que aumentó al utilizar imágenes de mayor resolución espacial. El uso combinado de diferentes resoluciones espaciales presentó ventajas para entender las transiciones de composición entre diferentes comunidades vegetales. Las tendencias encontradas indicaron un aumento del matorral subtropical y una disminución del pastizal inducido, lo que refleja transformaciones hacia una mayor diversidad de especies y una reducción de posibles amenazas para la biodiversidad a nivel paisaje.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Mexicana de BiodiversidadSame topicLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesFrench-language works237,207