Conceptualised psycho-medical footprint for health status outcomes and the potential impacts for early detection and prevention of chronic diseases in the context of 3P medicine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The Suboptimal Health Status Questionnaire-25 (SHSQ-25) is a distinctive medical psychometric diagnostic tool designed for the early detection of chronic diseases. However, the synaptic connections between the 25 symptomatic items and their relevance in supporting the monitoring of suboptimal health outcomes, which are precursors for chronic diseases, have not been thoroughly evaluated within the framework of predictive, preventive, and personalised medicine (PPPM/3PM). This baseline study explores the internal structure of the SHSQ-25 and demonstrates its discriminatory power to predict optimal and suboptimal health status (SHS) and develop photogenic representations of their distinct relationship patterns. Methods: = 217; aged 30-80 years; ~ 61% female), who responded to the SHSQ-25. The median SHS score was used to categorise the population into optimal and SHS. Graphical LASSO model and multi-dimensional scaling configuration methods were employed to describe the network structures for the two populations. Results: = 0.024). Fatigue emerged as a prominently central subclinical condition within the suboptimal population, whilst the cardiovascular system domain had the greatest relevance for the optimal population. The contrast in connectivity levels and the divergent prominence of specific subclinical conditions across domain networks shed light on potential health distinctions. Conclusions: We have demonstrated the feasibility of creating dynamic visualizers of the evolutionary trends in the relationships between the domains of SHSQ-25 relative to health status outcomes. This will provide in-depth comprehension of the conceptual model to inform personalised strategies to circumvent SHS. Additionally, the findings have implications for both health care and disease prevention because at-risk individuals can be predicted and prioritised for monitoring, and targeted intervention can begin before their symptoms reach an irreversible stage. Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13167-023-00344-2.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".