MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4388498333 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3083868/v1

A seven-Earth-radius helium-burning star inside a 20.5-min verification binary of GWs

2023· preprint· en· W4388498333 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Xiaofeng Wang, Jie Lin, Chengyuan Wu, Heran Xiong, Péter Németh, Zhanwen Han, Jiangdan Li, N. Elias–Rosa, I. Salmaso, A. V. Filippenko, Thomas G. Brink, Yi Yang, Xuefei Chen, Shengyu Yan, Jujia Zhang, Sufen Guo, Yongzhi Cai, Jun Mo, Gaobo Xi, Jialian Liu, Jincheng Guo, Qiqi Xia, Danfeng Xiang, Gaici Li, Zhenwei Li, WeiKang Zheng, Jicheng Zhang, Qichun Liu, Fangzhou Guo, Liyang Chen, Wenxiong Li

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPlanetary Science DivisionAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónScience Mission DirectorateSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryJet Propulsion LaboratoryInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieUniversity of California, Los AngelesStockholms UniversitetEuropean CommissionMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónLos Alamos National LaboratoryUniversity of WashingtonEuropean Space AgencyJohns Hopkins UniversityUniversità degli Studi di PadovaMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaQueen's UniversityDurham UniversityIstituto Nazionale di AstrofisicaSmithsonian InstitutionNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaGordon and Betty Moore FoundationQueen's University BelfastEötvös Loránd TudományegyetemCalifornia Institute of TechnologyDeutsches Elektronen-SynchrotronTencentW. M. Keck FoundationSpace Telescope Science InstituteNational Science FoundationNational Central UniversityNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsRADIUSHeliumBinary numberStar (game theory)PhysicsAstrophysicsAstronomyAtomic physicsComputer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Binary evolution theory predicts that the second common envelope (CE) ejection can produce low-mass (0.32-0.36 M⊙) subdwarf~B (sdB) stars inside ultrashort-orbital-period binary systems as their helium cores are ignited under nondegenerate conditions. With the orbital decay driven by radiation of gravitational waves, the minimum orbital period that an sdB binary formed in this channel can reach before the Roche-lobe overflow is ~20 minutes. However, only four sdB binaries with orbital periods below an hour have been reported so far, while none of them has an orbital period approaching the above theoretical limit. This leads to an unclear role of the second CE ejection in forming ultracompact sdB binaries and a blocked link between detached helium-burning-star binaries and gravitational-wave sources, AM CVn stars. Here we report the discovery of a 20.5-minute-orbital-period ellipsoidal binary, TMTS J052610.43+593445.1, in which the visible helium-burning sdB star is being tidally deformed by an invisible carbon-oxygen white dwarf (WD) companion. This sdB star is inferred to have a mass of ~0.33 M⊙, approaching that of the helium-ignition limit. Owing to the low-mass sdB star, WD companion, and extremely short orbital period, this system provides the first clear case to justify the formation of sdB binaries through the nondegenerate channel of second CE ejection. In particular, the radius of this low-mass sdB star is only 0.066 R⊙, about seven Earth radii, representing the most compact nondegenerate star ever known. As the shortest-orbital-period single-degenerate detached binary discovered up to date, TMTS J052610.43+593445.1 provides a crucial bridge to map the binary evolution scheme from the second CE ejection to the formation of AM CVn stars having a helium-star donor, and will serve as a crucial verification binary of space-borne gravitational-wave detectors in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→