Adrenal Suppression in Children During the Treatment for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Beyond Induction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adrenal suppression (AS) is an iatrogenic, life-threatening condition that can occur after glucocorticoid exposure. Despite recognition that AS occurs after induction phase treatment in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the risk of AS in phases beyond induction is unknown. We conducted a pilot study in pediatric patients with ALL to ascertain whether the risk of AS persists in post-induction phases of treatment. PROCEDURE: Patients diagnosed between 12 months to younger than 18 years with B or T-ALL and starting any new phase of treatment were eligible for the study. Relapsed or infant ALL were excluded. Low dose ACTH stimulation testing (LDST), measurement of albumin and cortisol binding globulin were performed in all patients. Screening for symptoms of AS was done. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients enrolled in the study. One was diagnosed with clear AS. Five others had a borderline cortisol peak, representing possible mild AS. Symptoms were nonspecific and did not help distinguish patients with normal LDST from those with borderline or abnormal results. CONCLUSION: Patients on treatment for ALL continue to be at risk of AS beyond induction treatment. Although this risk appears small, physicians must be vigilant as patients may be asymptomatic but could develop adrenal crisis during treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".