MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388505034 · doi:10.1109/tuffc.2023.3331356

Transparent Dual-Frequency CMUT Arrays for Photoacoustic Imaging

2023· article· en· W4388505034 on OpenAlexafffund
Mahyar Ghavami, Mohammad Rahim Sobhani, Roger J. Zemp

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Institutes of HealthCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMitacsUniversity of AlbertaAlberta InnovatesAlberta Innovates - Health SolutionsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCMC Microsystems
KeywordsCapacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducersMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsTransducerOpticsUltrasonic sensorCapacitive sensingCenter frequencyOpacityBandwidth (computing)Image resolutionAcousticsPiezoelectricityBand-pass filterComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The opaque ultrasound transducers used in conventional photoacoustic imaging systems necessitate oblique light delivery, which gives rise to some disadvantages such as inefficient target illumination and bulky system size. This work proposes a transparent capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducer (CMUT) linear array with dual-band operation for through-illumination photoacoustic imaging. Fabricated using an adhesive wafer bonding method, the array consists of optically transparent conductors [indium tin oxide (ITO)] as both top and bottom electrodes, a transparent polymer [bisbenzocyclobutene (BCB)] as the sidewall and adhesive material, and largely transparent silicon nitride as the membrane. The fabricated device had a maximum optical transparency of 76.8% in the visible range. Furthermore, to simultaneously maintain higher spatial resolution and deeper imaging depth, this dual-frequency array consists of low- and high-frequency channels with 4.2- and 9.3-MHz center frequencies, respectively, which are configured in an interlaced architecture to minimize the grating lobes in the receive point spread function (PSF). With a wider bandwidth compared to the single-frequency case, the fabricated transparent dual-frequency CMUT array was used in through-illumination photoacoustic imaging of wire targets demonstrating an improved spatial resolution and imaging depth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency ControlSame topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207