MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

FIB-SEM Tomography Acquisition and Data Processing Optimization for Logic and Memory Structures

2023· article· en· W4388506965 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings - International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIntegrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
Canadian institutionsFibics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistortion (music)Data acquisitionComputer scienceFocused ion beamMetrologyResolution (logic)Image resolutionElectronic engineeringComputer engineeringArtificial intelligenceComputer hardwareComputer visionOpticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Focused-Ion Beam Scanning Electron Microscopy (FIB-SEM) tomography is a high resolution three-dimensional (3D) imaging method with applications in failure analysis and metrology of semiconductor devices. For the smallest logic and memory structures currently in use, it requires single-digit nanometer 3D resolution. In this resolution range, avoiding distortion artifacts in the data becomes crucial. We present examples and discuss ways to reduce the likelihood of such artifacts during the data acquisition, as well as how to mitigate them in post-processing, and therefore increase the data quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.546
Threshold uncertainty score0.845

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it