MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388509508 · doi:10.58931/cibdt.2023.1319

Management of Clostridioides difficile in IBD patients

2023· article· en· W4388509508 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian IBD Today · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClostridioidesClostridium difficileMicrobiologyClostridium difficile toxin BPathogenDiarrheaIntestinal epitheliumVirulenceClostridium difficile toxin ATight junctionAntibioticsBiologyEnterotoxinEpitheliumMedicineCell biologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) is an anaerobic, spore-forming, Gram-positive bacterium. C. difficile is the most frequently reported nosocomial pathogen. C. difficile is also the most commonly identified pathogen associated with antibiotic-associated diarrhea, responsible for up to 30% of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Spores are transmitted via the fecal-oral route, and acquisition of C. difficile in the healthcare setting is generally by contaminated hands or surfaces. C. difficile has two monoglycosyltransferase virulence factors that are responsible for damage to the intestinal mucosa, enterotoxin A (TcdA) and cytotoxin B (TcdB). These two enzymes enter intestinal epithelium through receptor-mediated endocytosis and irreversibly inactive Rho GTPases. This ultimately disrupts the cytoskeleton and tight junctions, resulting in a loss of parenchymal polarity and eventual apoptosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.271
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it