MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388515752 · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kead595

Efficacy and safety of repository corticotropin injection for refractory cutaneous dermatomyositis: a prospective, open-label study

2023· article· en· W4388515752 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Anthony P. Fernandez, Josh Gallop, Samantha Polly, Urmi Khanna

Bibliographic record

VenueLara D. Veeken · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineAdverse effectDermatomyositisRefractory (planetary science)Quality of life (healthcare)Dermatology Life Quality IndexOpen labelProspective cohort studySeverity of illnessSurgeryDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Cutaneous dermatomyositis (DM) is often refractory to multiple medications. Repository corticotropin injection (RCI) is FDA-approved for DM, but little is known about its efficacy and safety for treating cutaneous DM. We conducted a prospective, open-label trial assessing efficacy and safety of RCI for treating refractory cutaneous DM. METHODS: DM patients with moderate-to-severe cutaneous activity [Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index activity (CDASI-A)] >14 despite prior treatment with ≥2 systemic agents were enrolled. Patients were initiated on 80 u RCI twice weekly for 6 months. Primary outcomes included significant decreases in CDASI-A and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) scores at 6 months. RESULTS: Of 19 patients enrolled, 15 patients (11 females, four males) with DM (seven classic, eight amyopathic) completed 6 months of RCI treatment. Patients were treated with a median 3.0 systemic medications prior to enrolment and were taking a median of 2.0 systemic medications at enrolment. Median baseline CDASI-A score was 19.0 and median PGA activity score was 2.5/10. For patient-reported outcomes, baseline median patient global skin score (PtGSS) was 3.0/10 and median dermatology life quality index (DLQI) score was 7.0/10. At 6 months, there were statistically significant improvements in CDASI-A scores (median = 10.0), PGA scores (median = 0.8/10), PtGSS scores (median = 7.0) and DLQI scores (median = 2.0), among others. Adverse effects were mild. CONCLUSIONS: RCI treatment resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in cutaneous DM activity and quality of life. Our results suggest RCI is an effective, safe and well-tolerated treatment for patients with refractory cutaneous dermatomyositis. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01906372).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLara D. VeekenSame topicInflammatory Myopathies and DermatomyositisFrench-language works237,207