Smooth Quadrature-Inspired Generalized Choquet Integral in an Application to Anomaly Detection
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we consider a new approach to the enhancement of classic Choquet integral as a vehicle in the processes of aggregation of classifiers o r i nformation fusion. The improvement of classification result o n a b asis o f classifier ensambles is one of the most important tasks of machine learning research community. In the previous series of works, we have introduced a conception of building Choquet-like aggregation operator using the idea inspired by one of the most common numerical methods, namely quadratures. Here, we extend this technique by using the concept which we call smoothing. We use this term to express the idea of smoothing the function under the integral symbol, and thus triggering processes that increase the elasticity of the Choquet integral. In a series of numerical experiments with anomaly detection problem, we show that the new approach is better than the existing ones in terms of accuracy and f1 score.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it