MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388521624 · doi:10.2196/preprints.54445

Development of Both a Risk Prediction Model for Conversion to Alzheimer’s Disease and Prototype Clinical Dashboard: A Prototype CDS Tool for PCPs to Monitor Cognitive Impairment (Preprint)

2023· preprint· en· W4388521624 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
rajesh nair

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare Systems and Public Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDashboardPreprintMedicineCognitionMedical recordComputer scienceData sciencePsychiatryWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> : Primary care physicians (PCPs) have substantial obstacles to detecting Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) including lack of time and ability to properly screen those with cognitive impairment. The solution for this project involves designing an algorithm based on known risk factors, such as depression ((as measured by a screening tool called Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)), level of exercise, education and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA. Using a Tableau dashboard embedded in a clinic electronic medical record (EMR), the solution will visually display critical indicators to the clinician and flag changes in health status. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> The purpose of this report is to describe a risk prediction model for cognitive impairment and potential conversion to AD and display the model in a prototype clinical dashboard (Nair-dashboard) for use as a clinical decision support (CDS) tool. Implementation strategies will also be discussed. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> This model was developed using data from a retrospective cohort of 960 patients with varying degrees of cognitive impairment who were seen in a primary outpatient clinic between 2000 and 2012 in Chicago (IL). All eligible patients were identified by a PCP. The clinic uses Cerbo EMR. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> The model had good discrimination, indicating good ability to separate those who convert to AD from those who do not. The Nair-dashboard produced visual displays for individual and overall risk factors of conversion to AD as a percentage. Additionally, patients with highest overall risk of conversion based on pre-set thresholds were also displayed. Errors were found with MoCA score trend lines and further troubleshooting was inconclusive. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> Cognitive impairment is a complex scenario, and the algorithm and dashboard can be the first steps to addressing some of these issues. The inherent limitations must be recognized, and future work would entail improving the performance. </sec>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.407
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHealthcare Systems and Public HealthFrench-language works237,207