MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388522020 · doi:10.1109/aeege58828.2023.00012

Cryogenic carbon capture using efficacious exchange of waste heat energy from flue gas with waste cold energy from LNG

2023· article· en· W4388522020 on OpenAlexaff
Fauzi Yusa Rahman, Ijaz Fazil Syed Ahmed Kabir, Mohan Kumar Gajendran, Sudhakar Vadivelu, E. Y. K. Ng

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiquefied natural gasWaste managementEnvironmental scienceFlue gasNatural gasEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Natural Gas (NG) is chilled to −160 degrees Celsius below its boiling point to generate Liquified Natural Gas (LNG), a liquid suitable for transport or storage. The LNG may then be regasified and delivered via distribution pipelines to different end-users or power generation units. Due to the very low temperature at which it is stored, LNG has a significant amount of exergy, which is released during the regasification process (LNG cold energy). Heat from ocean water and additional gas burners are being used for the regasification of LNG to NG especially in Singapore. This practice of dumping available cold energy causes an aquatic microclimate that has detrimental environmental consequences on marine life and is a negative consequence of LNG facilities. Conversely, excessive CO<inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</inf> emissions from flue gas have a substantial impact on the environment and human life. In recent years, there has been a progradation of the necessity to restrict CO<inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</inf> emissions in order to protect the environment. Due to its high CO<inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</inf> recovery rates and high purity, cryogenic carbon capture (CCC) may emerge as a viable alternative to other CO<inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</inf> separation techniques. Producing the cryogenic cold energy required for carbon capture has a downside. The objective of this study is to efficiently use or exchange both waste cold energy from LNG and waste heat energy from flue gas. The cryogenic cold energy from LNG may be utilized to extract CO<inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</inf> from flue gas by liquifying it, while the heat energy from flue gas can be used to regasify LNG. In this simulation, CFD simulations of a shell-and-tube heat exchanger was conducted, taking the phase change of flue gas to liquid flue gas and LNG to NG into consideration. To protect environment, it is conceivable to eliminate the utilization of ocean water and extract CO<inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</inf> from flue gas. This will contribute significantly to achieving Net Zero Carbon Emissions by 2050. Since it is hard to perform real-time experiments in this project because LNG regasification and flue gas capture need diverse industry collaborations and funds, the proof of concept is shown via the use of virtual CFD modeling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpacecraft and Cryogenic TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207