MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388524616 · doi:10.1016/j.crmeth.2023.100637

Exploiting the endogenous yeast nuclear proteome to identify short linear motifs in vivo

2023· article· en· W4388524616 on OpenAlexafffund
Tanner M. Tessier, Cason R. King, Joe S. Mymryk

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Reports Methods · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiotin and Related Studies
Canadian institutionsLawson Health Research InstituteWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsProteomeComputational biologyYeastContext (archaeology)Saccharomyces cerevisiaeBiologyIdentification (biology)Human proteome projectNuclear proteinCell biologyProteomicsBiochemistryGeneTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peptide-domain interactions mediated by short linear motifs (SLiMs) play crucial roles in cellular biology. The simplicity of SLiMs poses challenges in their computational identification. Existing high-throughput methods for discovering SLiMs lack cellular context as they are typically performed in vitro. We developed a functional selection method using yeast to identify peptides that interact with the endogenous yeast nuclear proteome. Remarkably, peptides selected for in yeast also mediated nuclear import in human cells. Notably, the identified peptides did not resemble classical nuclear localization sequences. This platform has the potential to identify and investigate motifs that interact with the nuclear proteome of yeast and human and to aid in the identification and understanding of alternative protein nuclear import mechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell Reports MethodsSame topicBiotin and Related StudiesFrench-language works237,207