MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388525448 · doi:10.1038/s41584-023-01045-w

International Guideline for Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy-Associated Cancer Screening: an International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group (IMACS) initiative

2023· review· en· W4388525448 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Reviews Rheumatology · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de MontréalMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
FundersSpark TherapeuticsManchester Biomedical Research CentreSanofi GenzymeGrifolsMitsubishi Tanabe Pharma CorporationAstellas PharmaPrinses Beatrix SpierfondsUniversity College LondonDepartment of Health and Social CareGenentechAmicus TherapeuticsHorizon TherapeuticsMyositis AssociationEMD SeronoSarepta TherapeuticsArgenxNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin DiseasesSanofiNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer ResearchHealth~HollandNational Institutes of HealthRegeneron PharmaceuticalsAlexion PharmaceuticalsKisseiAlnylam PharmaceuticalsGilead SciencesCelgenePfizerBiogenChugai PharmaceuticalConsejo Estatal de Ciencia y Tecnología de JaliscoGlaxoSmithKlineAmgenNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchCSL BehringAstraZenecaEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsMedicineGuidelineMyositisMyopathyInflammatory myopathyCancerPhysical therapyInternal medicineIntensive care medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.166
GPT teacher head0.524
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it