MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388529140 · doi:10.1093/jas/skad281.416

PSXII-10 Development of a 70k Snp Genotyping Array for American Mink (<i>Neogale vison</i>)

2023· article· en· W4388529140 on OpenAlexaffabout
Duy Ngoc, Karim Karimi, Mehdi Sargolzaei, Graham Plastow, Zhiquan Wang, Younes Miar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of GuelphDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMinkGenotypingSingle-nucleotide polymorphismBiologySNPAmerican minkSNP genotypingGeneticsSNP arrayGenotypeMolecular Inversion ProbeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Mink is an important fur animal species; however, little is known about the genomics of complex traits in mink. The development of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array has accelerated genomics application in animal breeding by facilitating genotyping and associated analyses. The current project aimed to design a medium-density SNP array in American mink for genomic studies and selection in this species. For this purpose, whole genome sequence with 30x coverage was generated for 100 individuals from the Canadian Centre for Fur Animal Research (CCFAR) at the Dalhousie Faculty of Agriculture (Truro, NS, Canada) and Millbank Fur Farm (Rockwood, ON, Canada). Variant calling was done using Samtools and GATK pipelines. A total of 8,373,854 bi-allelic SNPs identified by both pipelines were used for an initial selection of 91K SNPs for submission to the Affymetrix scoring system. After filtering, 62,375 SNPs were selected for probe design and production of an Axiom Mink Genotyping Array 70K. This 70K SNP array was used to genotype 2,973 mink for validation. After quality control of genotypes, 47,159 SNPs were classified as high-resolution SNPs, and among them 24,237 were polymorphic. A preliminary genome-wide association study of 1,356 mink for body length at harvest identified a SNP (AX-647623051) significantly associated (P < 1.26 × 10-5) with the trait. In conclusion, this 70K mink SNP array could be used for genomic studies and potentially as a starting point for genomic selection programs in American mink.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockFrench-language works237,207