MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388529181 · doi:10.1093/jas/skad281.395

399 Methionine and Guanidinoacetic Acid Supplementation Throughout the Periconceptual Period of Gestation Alters Metabolite Concentrations and Fetal Development

2023· article· en· W4388529181 on OpenAlexaff
Kathlyn M Hauxwell, Robert A. Cushman, Joel S Caton, Alison K Ward, Amanda K. Lindholm‐Perry, Alexandria P Snider, H. C. Freetly, Carl R Dahlen, Samat Amat, Bryan W Neville, Jennifer F. Thorson, William T. Oliver, Jeremy R. Miles, Matthew S Crouse

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFolate and B Vitamins Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGestationFetusMethionineMetaboliteAnimal scienceBiologySireEndocrinologyPregnancyInternal medicineBiochemistryAmino acidMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recent research reported changes in fetal growth due to increased methyl donor availability through periconceptual supplementation of the dam. We hypothesized that maternal supplementation of methionine (MET) or guanidinoacetic acid (GAA) during the periconceptual period will result in a methyl donor surplus or deficiency in maternal serum and ultimately influence fetal body and organ weight at d +63 gestation. The objectives of this study were to evaluate effects of methyl donor surplus or deficiency during the periconceptual period of gestation on metabolite concentrations in the heifer and the effects on early fetal development. Eighty MARC II heifers (n = 20 per treatment, initial BW = 346 ± 8 kg) were stratified by age and weight to one of four treatment groups to receive 100 g of supplement: ground corn carrier as control (CON), MET (10 g/d) in ground corn, GAA (40 g/d) in ground corn, and MET + GAA (10 g/d MET + 40 g/d GAA) in ground corn. Supplementation began 63 d before breeding (d –63) until d 63 of gestation (d +63), and serum samples were collected before feeding on d -63, at breeding, and d +63. Heifers were bred using male sexed semen from the same sire, and 35 heifers were confirmed pregnant (CON, n = 10; MET, n = 8; GAA, n = 7; MET + GAA, n =10) and harvested at d +63 of gestation to collect maternal and fetal samples. Data were analyzed as a 2 × 2 factorial design with 2 levels of MET and 2 levels of GAA. Methionine concentrations in maternal serum were greater (P = 0.05) in MET and MET + GAA supplemented heifers at d 0 and d +63 compared with CON and GAA at d -63, d 0, and d +63. There were no differences (P ≥ 0.15) in the concentration of GAA or creatine due to supplementation; however, both were decreased at breeding (P < 0.01) compared with d -63 and d +63. Fetuses from MET supplemented heifers had greater (P = 0.01) brain weight and Longissimus muscle than dams not receiving MET. We conclude that MET supplementation during the periconceptual period can alter methyl donor availability and increase fetal muscle development. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicFolate and B Vitamins ResearchFrench-language works237,207