PNet—A Deep Learning Based Photometry and Astrometry Bayesian Framework
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Time-domain astronomy has emerged as a vibrant research field in recent years, focusing on celestial objects that exhibit variable magnitudes or positions. Given the urgency of conducting follow-up observations for such objects, the development of an algorithm capable of detecting them and determining their magnitudes and positions has become imperative. Leveraging the advancements in deep neural networks, we present PNet, an end-to-end framework designed not only to detect celestial objects and extract their magnitudes and positions, but also to estimate the photometric uncertainty. PNet comprises two essential steps. First, it detects stars and retrieves their positions, magnitudes, and calibrated magnitudes. Subsequently, in the second phase, PNet estimates the uncertainty associated with the photometry results, serving as a valuable reference for the light-curve classification algorithm. Our algorithm has been tested using both simulated and real observation data, demonstrating the ability of PNet to deliver consistent and reliable outcomes. Integration of PNet into data-processing pipelines for time-domain astronomy holds significant potential for enhancing response speed and improving the detection capabilities for celestial objects with variable positions and magnitudes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".