MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388532290 · doi:10.1093/jas/skad281.037

137 Longitudinal Heritability of Ocular Microbiota in Preweaned Beef Cattle

2023· article· en· W4388532290 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Drew Lakamp, Alison Bartenslager, Matthew M. Hille, John Dustin Loy, Samodha C. Fernando, Matthew L Spangler

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicMicrobial infections and disease research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Food and AgricultureGenome CanadaU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsHeritabilityBiologyBreedMicrobiomeVeterinary medicineAnimal scienceGeneticsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The bovine ocular microbiome is of interest because of its potential role in ocular disease, such as infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis. The ocular bacterial community of 223 pre-weaned beef calves from a single cohort were sampled four times; day 0, day 21, day 41, and day 139 (mean calf ages 65, 86, 99, and 204 days, respectively). The bacterial community was phenotyped using the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene and were grouped into amplicon sequence variants (ASV) which were taxonomically classified at the phylum and family level. Heritability was estimated for the log transformed relative abundance of each phylum, family, and ASV at each time point using ASReml v. 4.2. The model included calf age at time of sampling, calf sex, pinkeye vaccination treatment group, breed fractions, and retained heterosis as fixed effects. The random effect of animal had a (co)variance structure given by an H matrix comprised of 3,025 animals of which 1,207 were genotyped including all of the sampled animals. Heritability estimates ranged from 0.16 to 0.95 at the ASV level, 0.18 to 0.91 at the family level, and 0.18 to 0.81 at the phylum level. Standard errors were approximately 0.20 on average. The number of features (ASV, family, or phylum) with estimates greater than their standard error changed across time points (Table 1). Overall, time point 1 had the largest number of features with estimates greater than their standard error, followed by time point 4. Time point 3 had a greater number ASV with estimates greater than their standard error than time point 2; however, time point 2 had greater numbers of families and phyla with estimates greater than their standard errors. This trend likely stems from the fact that time points 1 and 4 had the greatest diversity of features while time point 2 had the least diversity. Average Chao1 index diversity estimates of ASV were 144.6, 28.1, 64.7, and 194.6, for time points 1 through 4, respectively. We hypothesize this is due to the perturbation of the ocular microbiome at sampling and the fact that overall diversity in the microbiome recovered by the final sampling, although, species composition differed compared with time point 1. While no ASV, family, or phylum had a heritability estimate greater than its standard error across all time points, certain features had heritabilities greater than their standard errors at multiple time points. The phylum Armatimonadota had heritability estimates greater than their standard error at time points 1, 2, and 4 (0.52, 0.18, and 0.37, respectively). Additionally, an ASV of the Streptococcus genus had estimates of 0.26, 0.45, and 0.26 at time points 1, 2, and 3, respectively. These estimates demonstrate that certain features of the ocular microbiome are influenced by host genetics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicMicrobial infections and disease researchFrench-language works237,207