MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388536477 · doi:10.18280/jesa.560519

Performance and Robustness Enhancement of Fractional Order Controller (FOC) for Electric Vehicles (EV) Using Intelligent Swarms

2023· article· en· W4388536477 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hussain Ali Azzawi, Sabah A. Gitaffa, Nihad M. Ameen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Control theory (sociology)Computer scienceControl engineeringAutomotive engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the impacts of global warming intensify, the automotive industry is increasingly emphasizing the development of eco-friendly vehicles with superior range and performance compared to conventional ones.Electric vehicles have emerged as a promising solution to reduce harmful emissions in the transportation sector.This study focuses on creating a nonlinear dynamic model for electric vehicles by integrating kinetic and electrical components.The key criterion in EV speed control is robustness, prompting the construction of various controllers to ensure resilience and disturbance rejection.These controllers include both traditional ones like proportional-integral-derivative (PID) and fractional order PID (FOPID) controllers.Fractional calculus has gained significant attention in control systems engineering due to the fractional orders of the integral and derivative terms, offering enhanced robustness and optimal control.This thesis employs multiple optimization strategies to design an FOPID controller, ensuring the optimal performance of a robust control system for electric vehicles.Initially, the controller is developed using intelligent swarm optimization techniques, such as particle swarm optimization (PSO) and grey wolf optimization (GWO), through simulations in MATLAB R2022b.The results demonstrate the effectiveness of PSO and GWO algorithms in reducing the objective integral of time multiplied by absolute error (ITAE) function in the speed control system utilizing an FOPID controller.The performance of a conventional PID controller is compared with that of a FOPID controller, highlighting the superiority of the GWO-FOPID strategy, presented as a novel methodology.The outcomes underscore the remarkable performance of the GWO-FOPID controller, ensuring rapid responsiveness in controlling EV speed, with a rise time of 0.008978 seconds, a settling time of 0.01 seconds, and zero absolute time error (ITAE).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicAdvanced Control Systems DesignFrench-language works237,207