MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388536477 · doi:10.18280/jesa.560519

Performance and Robustness Enhancement of Fractional Order Controller (FOC) for Electric Vehicles (EV) Using Intelligent Swarms

2023· article· en· W4388536477 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Control theory (sociology)Computer scienceControl engineeringAutomotive engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the impacts of global warming intensify, the automotive industry is increasingly emphasizing the development of eco-friendly vehicles with superior range and performance compared to conventional ones.Electric vehicles have emerged as a promising solution to reduce harmful emissions in the transportation sector.This study focuses on creating a nonlinear dynamic model for electric vehicles by integrating kinetic and electrical components.The key criterion in EV speed control is robustness, prompting the construction of various controllers to ensure resilience and disturbance rejection.These controllers include both traditional ones like proportional-integral-derivative (PID) and fractional order PID (FOPID) controllers.Fractional calculus has gained significant attention in control systems engineering due to the fractional orders of the integral and derivative terms, offering enhanced robustness and optimal control.This thesis employs multiple optimization strategies to design an FOPID controller, ensuring the optimal performance of a robust control system for electric vehicles.Initially, the controller is developed using intelligent swarm optimization techniques, such as particle swarm optimization (PSO) and grey wolf optimization (GWO), through simulations in MATLAB R2022b.The results demonstrate the effectiveness of PSO and GWO algorithms in reducing the objective integral of time multiplied by absolute error (ITAE) function in the speed control system utilizing an FOPID controller.The performance of a conventional PID controller is compared with that of a FOPID controller, highlighting the superiority of the GWO-FOPID strategy, presented as a novel methodology.The outcomes underscore the remarkable performance of the GWO-FOPID controller, ensuring rapid responsiveness in controlling EV speed, with a rise time of 0.008978 seconds, a settling time of 0.01 seconds, and zero absolute time error (ITAE).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.445
Threshold uncertainty score0.933

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it