The transcriptional legacy of developmental stochasticity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genetic and environmental variation are key contributors during organism development, but the influence of minor perturbations or noise is difficult to assess. This study focuses on the stochastic variation in allele-specific expression that persists through cell divisions in the nine-banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus). We investigated the blood transcriptome of five wild monozygotic quadruplets over time to explore the influence of developmental stochasticity on gene expression. We identify an enduring signal of autosomal allelic variability that distinguishes individuals within a quadruplet despite their genetic similarity. This stochastic allelic variation, akin to X-inactivation but broader, provides insight into non-genetic influences on phenotype. The presence of stochastically canalized allelic signatures represents a novel axis for characterizing organismal variability, complementing traditional approaches based on genetic and environmental factors. We also developed a model to explain the inconsistent penetrance associated with these stochastically canalized allelic expressions. By elucidating mechanisms underlying the persistence of allele-specific expression, we enhance understanding of development's role in shaping organismal diversity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".