MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Research on Capital Structure and Investment Value of the Technology Industry

2023· article· en· W4388538360 on OpenAlexaffabout
Peng Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Economics Management and Political Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Context (archaeology)BusinessValue (mathematics)Investment (military)Perspective (graphical)Work (physics)Capital (architecture)The InternetCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Capital investmentMarketingEngineeringFinanceGeographyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper aims to discuss the changes in the IT development industry under the influence of the worldwide pandemic. The worldwide pandemic has had a very significant impact on economies all over the world. In this context, the result and the changes produced by the IT industry, which has been strongly developed recently, are undoubtedly significant. With the impact of the epidemic, all countries need to consider the spread of the epidemic. This has led to the temporary closure of schools, stores in many countries. People need to use the Internet to work, study and shop. This has made people more dependent on the IT industry. While most industries are slowing down due to the epidemic, the IT industry is growing more rapidly due to people's needs. This paper compares the WACCs of Intel, Qualcomm, and Advanced Micro Devices for the first quarter of 2023 and examines why the WACCs differ from a consumer perspective. This paper also discusses how to observe and invest in these three companies from an investor's perspective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Economics Management and Political Sciences→Same topicCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts→French-language works237,207→