MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388539556 · doi:10.1093/jas/skad281.208

242 Methionine and Guanidinoacetic Acid Supplementation During the Periconceptual Period of Gestation Shifts Methionine Metabolism of Fetal Bull Calves at D 63 of Gestation

2023· article· en· W4388539556 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew S Crouse, Kathlyn M Hauxwell, Joel S Caton, Alison K Ward, Carl R Dahlen, Samat Amat, H. C. Freetly, Amanda K. Lindholm‐Perry, Bryan W Neville, William T. Oliver, Jennifer F. Thorson, Alexandria P Snider, Jeremy R. Miles, Robert A. Cushman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism and Genetic Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMethionineGestationFetusAnimal scienceSireBiologyPregnancyInternal medicineEndocrinologyAndrologyAmino acidBiochemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recent research has demonstrated that feeding rumen protected methionine (MET) products increases circulating methionine while feeding guanidinoacetic acid (GAA) may result in a methyl deficiency. Therefore, we hypothesized that maternal MET or GAA supplementation from 63 days before breeding until d 63 of gestation would increase fetal hepatic methyl donors or result in a fetal hepatic methyl donor deficiency, respectively. Eighty MARC II heifers (n = 20 per treatment; initial BW = 344 ± 8 kg; day -63) were weighed and assigned to one of four breeding groups and four treatments stratified by age and starting weight. Heifers were fed a total mixed ration to gain 0.68 kg/d and received 100 g of one of four treatments top dressed: control supplement of ground corn (CON), MET (10 g/d) in a ground corn carrier, GAA (40 g/d) in a ground corn carrier, or MET + GAA (10 g/d MET + 40 g/d GAA) in a ground corn carrier. At breeding (d 0), all heifers were bred to a single sire using male sexed semen. At d 63 of gestation, 35 heifers (CON n = 10, MET n = 8, GAA n = 7, MET + GAA, n = 10) confirmed pregnant with bull calves were humanely slaughtered and fetal liver tissues were collected and sent to Metabolon Inc. for global metabolomics analysis. Data were analyzed as a 2 x 2 factorial with 2 levels of GAA and 2 levels of MET with breeding group included in the model. For this abstract, only metabolites from the methionine cycle and adjacent pathways will be reported and only metabolites with significant P-values will be discussed (P ≤ 0.05). There were no main effects or interactions for the abundance of methionine, GAA, creatine, SAM, SAH or homocysteine. Glycine was decreased and sarcosine increased in fetuses from MET supplemented dams. Serine was affected by a MET x GAA interaction being decreased in livers of CON, MET, and MET + GAA fetuses compared with GAA. Cystathione, S-methylcysteine, s-methylcysteine sulfoxide, and hypotaurine were greater in fetuses of MET supplemented heifers and pyridoxal phosphate was reduced in fetal liver of MET supplemented heifers. The abundance of urea was greater in GAA supplemented fetuses. These results indicate that fetuses from dams fed methionine may be able to maintain balance in methionine supply by shunting methionine through adjacent pathways including the transsulfuration pathway. We also interpret these data to imply that excess methionine is not utilized by the fetus and is metabolized to products that can be excreted. Lastly, GAA did not alter the fetal methyl supply. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Funded by (USDA-NIFA-AFRI # 2022-67015-36196).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicMetabolism and Genetic DisordersFrench-language works237,207