Ten Steps Toward Improving In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Quality of Care and Outcomes
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Full frame distilled prediction
Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
- Candidate categories
- none
- Consensus categories
- none
- Domain
- Candidate signal: noneConsensus signal: none
- Study design
- Candidate signal: ObservationalConsensus signal: Observational
- Genre
- Candidate signal: EmpiricalConsensus signal: Empirical
- Teacher disagreement score
- 0.026
- Threshold uncertainty score
- 0.399
- Validation status
machine_predicted_unvalidated·codex-gemma-dda1882f352a
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
Committee on Resuscitation, Resuscitation Councils of Asia, Indian Resuscitation Council Federation, and the collaborating organization, International Federation of Red Cross. The Ten Steps Toward Improving In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Quality of Care and Outcomes in this document (Fig. These steps represent the consensus of a Writing Group of >30 interprofessional experts drawn from various branches of medicine, nursing, and allied health care professions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- Resuscitation
- Topic
- Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
- Field
- Medicine
- Canadian institutions
- University of TorontoUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of OttawaStollery Children's Hospital
- Funders
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration WestU.S. Department of DefenseAgency for Healthcare Research and QualityNational Institutes of HealthLaerdal Foundation for Acute MedicineUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS TrustBritish Heart FoundationNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchZOLL Medical CorporationEuropean Resuscitation CouncilAmerican Heart AssociationNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
- Keywords
- MedicineScopusResuscitationIncidence (geometry)GuidelineCardiopulmonary resuscitationIntensive careAuditEmergency medicineMedical emergencyMEDLINEIntensive care medicine
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes