MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4388558103 · doi:10.1149/1945-7111/ad0bab

Improved Elevated Temperature Performance of LiFePO<sub>4</sub>/Graphite Cell by Blending NMC640 in Cathode

2023· article· en· W4388558103 on OpenAlexafffund
Meng Yue, C. P. Aiken, Jay Deshmukh, Matthew D. L. Garayt, Michel B. Johnson, J. R. Dahn, Chongyin Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCathodeGraphiteAnodeMaterials scienceChemical engineeringElectrochemistryDeposition (geology)Composite materialElectrodeChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Physical mixtures of LiMn2O4 (LMO) and NMC active cathode materials is a well-known strategy in commercial batteries to achieve better cycling and storage performance than cells with a pure LMO cathode. In this work, we demonstrated a similar synergic effect in LiFePO4(LFP)/NMC640 cathode material blends. Blending LFP with NMC640 in the weight ratio of 90% to 10% lead to improvements in cycling and storage compared to cells with LFP alone. A clear linear coordination between capacity loss and iron deposition on the graphite anode was observed in these blended cells. This work shows that blending NMC in LFP cathode is a promising strategy to improve the high-temperature stability of LFP/graphite cells for long-term operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical Society→Same topicAdvancements in Battery Materials→French-language works237,207→