Correspondence on “Defluorination of Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) by <i>Acidimicrobium</i> sp. Strain A6”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVCorrespondence/Rebut...Correspondence/RebuttalNEXTORIGINAL ARTICLEThis notice is a correctionCorrespondence on "Defluorination of Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) by Acidimicrobium sp. Strain A6"Jinxia Liu*Jinxia LiuDepartment of Civil Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0C3, Canada*[email protected]More by Jinxia Liuhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2505-9642, Elizabeth EdwardsElizabeth EdwardsDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3E5, CanadaMore by Elizabeth Edwardshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8071-338X, Jonathan Van HammeJonathan Van HammeDepartment of Biological Sciences, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, BC V2C 0C8, CanadaMore by Jonathan Van Hamme, Mike ManefieldMike ManefieldDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, AustraliaMore by Mike Manefieldhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1880-0888, Christopher P. HigginsChristopher P. HigginsDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401, United StatesMore by Christopher P. Higginshttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6220-8673, Jens BlotevogelJens BlotevogelCSIRO, Environment, Waite Campus, Urrbrae, SA 5064, AustraliaMore by Jens Blotevogelhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2740-836X, Jinyong LiuJinyong LiuDepartment of Chemical & Environmental Engineering, University of California, Riverside, California 92507, United StatesMore by Jinyong Liu, and Linda S. LeeLinda S. LeeDepartment of Agronomy and Environmental & Ecological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47906, United StatesMore by Linda S. Leehttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4471-7284Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 48, 20440–20442Publication Date (Web):November 10, 2023Publication History Received17 August 2023Accepted25 October 2023Revised29 August 2023Published online10 November 2023Published inissue 5 December 2023https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.3c06681https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c06681correctionACS PublicationsCopyright © 2023 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use. Request reuse permissions This publication is free to access through this site. Learn MoreArticle Views4358Altmetric-Citations1LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail PDF (1010 KB) Get e-AlertscloseSUBJECTS:Adsorption,Biodegradation,Dissolved organic matter,Oxides,Redox reactions Get e-Alerts
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.338 | 0.116 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".