Application of Sofia Plus catheter tip shaping in the treatment of acute middle cerebral artery occlusion: A case control study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To explore the safety and efficacy of Sofia Plus distal access catheter tip shaping for treatment of acute middle cerebral artery embolism. This single-center retrospective study involved patients eligible for acute embolic middle cerebral artery occlusion from January 2020 to October 2021. They were divided into a shaping and non-shaping group according to whether the Sofia Plus catheter tip was shaped intraoperatively. Baseline data, preoperative Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography (ASPECT) score, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, onset-to-admission time, admission-to-puncture time, Sofia Plus-clot time, puncture-to-reperfusion time, surgical approach, and use of a stent for rescue thrombectomy were compared between the 2 groups. Postoperative symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and the modified Rankin scale score at the 90-day follow-up were observed. In total, 54 patients were enrolled in this study (shaping group, 26 patients; non-shaping group, 28 patients). Their mean age was 64.8 ± 14.6 years, and the proportion of men was 68.5% (37/54). Successful recanalization was achieved in all patients. There were no differences in the baseline data (age, sex, history, pre-admission ASPECT score, or NIHSS score) between the shaping and non-shaping groups. Patients treated with a shaped Sofia Plus catheter had a shorter Sofia Plus-clot time [median (25th, 75th percentile: 4 (4, 7) vs 10.5 (5.25, 14) min, P = .006] and puncture-to-reperfusion time [16.5 (12, 30.5) vs 26 (16.25, 38.25) min, P = .036]. There were significant differences in the surgical approaches between the 2 groups. The rates of a favorable outcome (57.7% vs 64.3%, P = .62) and postoperative symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (7.7% vs 3.6%, P = .60) were not significantly different between the groups. Sofia Plus catheter tip shaping improved catheter trafficability and reduced the operative time. It was safe and effective for treatment of acute middle cerebral artery thrombotic occlusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".