MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4388564587 · doi:10.54563/asgn.940

Devonian Sandstones from the Lievin Shaft n° 8, Avion (Pas-de-Calais, France) : Historical Context and Additional Vertebrate Remains

2014· article· en· W4388564587 on OpenAlexaff
Alain Blieck, André Styza

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de la Société Géologique du Nord · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsCegep de La Pocatiere
FundersUppsala UniversitetNorthern Arizona University
KeywordsDevonianGeologyCalaisPaleontologyPaleozoicHumanitiesArchaeologyArtGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Liévin shaft n° 8 of the Nord – Pas-de-Calais coal basin worked as a ventilation shaft from 1948 to 1982. Collections of Early Devonian vertebrates, made both in situ during boring of the shaft, and later on its slag heap, included mostly pteraspidid heterostracans, plus a few remains of cyathaspidiforms, osteostracans, as well as thelodont and acanthodian scales. In 1982, vertebrates were collected on its slag heap. They came from the subsurface Lochkovian, lower Pernes Formation. They include Heterostraci (Traquairaspididae indet., Rhinopteraspis crouchi, Pteraspididae indet.), Osteostraci (Cephalaspis sp.) and ‘actinolepid’ Arthrodira (Kujdanowiaspis? sp.). These are dated of the R. crouchi Biozone, and correlated to the ‘middle’ Lochkovian. As in the Liévin shaft n° 6, it corresponds to the highest diversity for the latest Silurian-Early Devonian sequence of vertebrates in Artois (northern France). This peak is known worldwide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.220
Threshold uncertainty score0.438

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales de la Société Géologique du Nord→Same topicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology→French-language works237,207→