MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388566420 · doi:10.18280/ijsse.130514

An Adaptive Context-Aware Authentication System on Smartphones Using Machine Learning

2023· article· en· W4388566420 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Safety and Security Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicUser Authentication and Security Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceContext (archaeology)Authentication (law)Human–computer interactionComputer securityEmbedded systemMachine learningArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authentication method for unlocking screens is an essential security feature of smartphones to avoid unauthorized access.Various mechanisms have been integrated into smartphones to authenticate users to reduce privacy infringement.Contextual awareness is now a key requirement for mobile computing to make intelligent decisions and provide an adaptable and convenient authentication model.Therefore, in this paper, a contextaware authentication system based on a machine learning technique is proposed.The proposed system takes the user's body postures, location, SMS contents, and ambient environmental conditions as context.To enhance privacy protection, these context factors are selected to guide the authentication process and enable the authentication system to understand users and their surrounding environment.However, to provide the most appropriate authentication method, a machine learning model is designed.The model is trained and tested with the user's context datasets.An appropriate dataset for the machine learning model is generated, and features that affect end-user interaction during the authentication process are identified.A total of 25 responses from smartphone owners were collected to evaluate the proposed system.After conducting a sentiment analysis, we found that 72 percent of users have a positive sentiment regarding the proposed system, which means that context-aware technology helps improve authentication adaptability and provides a convenient authentication method.The performance of the model was tested, and the results show that the proposed model effectively achieves a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 1.299, a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 1.437, and an R Square of 76.78.Therefore, the system can improve the reliability and adaptability of the authentication process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score0.454

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it