CONQUERING HEARTS AND MINDS: SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL COMPETENCIES AS A REFLECTION OF NEOLIBERAL RATIONALITY IN LIFE PROJECT TEACHING TEXTBOOK
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: This text aims at analyzing didactic collection (textbooks) entitled Life Project, in order to study how social-emotional competencies are addressed in such teaching materials and how they reflect the desires of neoliberal rationality. We search for theoretical support in studies developed especially in the reflections initially developed by Foucault (2008), later expanded by Dardot and Laval (2016) about neoliberalism.In what is concerned to methodology, it should be emphasized that this is a descriptive-interpretative study of documentary nature, following mainly a qualitative approach. The corpus is formed by fragments extracted from three teaching book collections entitled Life Project, books approved by the National Book and Teaching Material Program (PNLD), 2021 edition. Through the analysis, it can be considered that there is a direct relationship between social emotional competencies and neoliberal rationality, because young people are guided to regulate their emotions in order to improve their human capital and, as a corollary, they build their life project based on what is desirable at the core of a rationality nuanced by competition, individuality, resilience and autonomy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".