MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388581200 · doi:10.1145/3624062.3624221

Enabling Scalable VQE Simulation on Leading HPC Systems

2023· article· en· W4388581200 on OpenAlexaff
Meng Wang, Fei Hua, Chenxu Liu, Nicholas P. Bauman, Karol Kowalski, Daniel Claudino, Travis S. Humble, Prashant J. Nair, Ang Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantum computerComputer scienceScalabilityQubitSupercomputerQuantum circuitQuantumQuantum simulatorQuantum algorithmComputational scienceComputer engineeringQuantum networkParallel computingTheoretical computer sciencePhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Large-scale simulations of quantum circuits pose significant challenges, especially in quantum chemistry, due to the number of qubits, circuit depth, and the number of circuits needed per problem. High-performance computing (HPC) systems offer massive computational capabilities that could help overcome these obstacles. We developed a high-performance quantum circuit simulator called NWQ-Sim, and demonstrated its capability to simulate large quantum chemistry problems on NERSC’s Perlmutter supercomputer. Integrating NWQ-Sim with XACC, an open-source programming framework for quantum-classical applications, we have executed quantum phase estimation (QPE) and variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) algorithms for downfolded quantum chemistry systems at unprecedented scales. Our work demonstrates the potential of leveraging HPC resources and optimized simulators to advance quantum chemistry and other applications of near-term quantum devices. By scaling to larger qubit counts and circuit depths, high-performance simulators like NWQ-Sim will be critical for characterizing and validating quantum algorithms before their deployment on actual quantum hardware.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureFrench-language works237,207